AA5 Traveler convential landing gear

Home Forums Ask the Gurus AA5 Traveler convential landing gear

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #12667
      Ryan
      Participant

      Hello,

      Im smitten with the AA1’s in particular when a tail wheel is installed. Im wondering if a Traveler could have the same STC applied without making much up. Would it be structurally sound? I’m aware the Traveler and Yankee came front the same draft board and that’s why I’m asking.

      I’m not concerned about the legalities of it at this time.

      I live in Canada and we have a owner maintenance category which would permit modifications if they’re backed with reasonable data. One can’t leave the country in this category.

      I’ve a baby now so getting a Yankee, even though they did have a child seat option doesn’t make long-term sense.

    • #12669
      Richard Harrison
      Participant

      Over the years there has been conversation about building up an AA-5X with conventional gear, but most opinions have said that in the US you would never get it approved today. If you check the Grumman Gang archives you might find some past comments. When “Mean Gene” Plazak got the AA-1 STC, it was a much simpler time to get something like that approved.
      I have owned an AA-1B since 1981 and put a 0-320 in it shortly after that. I had thought about putting the Taildragger STC on it, until I got a chance to fly one. The gear is so far forward that you must fly it off and land 3 point. I talked to Gene later about that and he said the FAA forced him to move the gear out to reduce the chance of nose over. Gene past away a few years ago, and last I heard someone in NY state bought the STC.
      So for the AA-5X, you have a lot of different dynamics in play. You have a longer fuselage, so what kind of beefing of the tailcone would be required to support the tailwheel? If you can find a set would Gene’s brackets and main gear legs work on an AA-5 (will it support the wight and place the gear at the optimum position for the -5), or would something new need to be engineered, designed, and built?
      My feeling is that should you go down this route, your kids might be long out of the house before you have such a project flying. You might be better off looking at the Home Built world (RV-10 and many others) or say a trusty but slow Stinson, Piper Pacer, C-170 or 180, ect.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.